Despite the progress client-side scripting has made in the last decade or so, it seems some bad practices are poised to never die. With the medium transitioning into a more mobile-centric world in recent years, an influx in bugs has many turning back to browser detection for a solution. History seems to repeat itself in this regard. It has long been my contention that browser detection should not and can not be relied upon. However, the validity of the use case has become difficult to dismiss, and the lack of an alternative leaves me with no other options and more than a little conflicted. For this article, I will be discussing the various facets of browser detection and offer some recommendations to maximize reliability.
The dawn of HTML5 brought about a whole heap of new semantic tags. However, like CSS3, the specification is still relatively new and many of the browsers are slow to adopt the new elements. Tags such as
<canvas> do not possess widespread browser support just yet. Despite this level of inconsistent support, you should not be deterred from using these new tags, but it may be pertinent to be aware of their availability.
The try/catch block is a unique construct, both in how it works and what it is capable of. Fundamentally, it is able to isolate one or more statements to capture and suppress any runtime errors that may be encountered as a result of execution. It is such a powerful construct that in a perfect world you would want to wrap everything in a try/catch block to provide simple and effective error trapping. However, due to concerns in performance critical situations, employing the construct is often frowned upon. But what if I told you there was a means of emulating the try/catch block without the concern for performance? This article will be exploring just such a method.
To harness the most out of CSS classes is to take advantage of what truly is the unsung hero of advanced RIA development as it relates to the presentation layer. When we observe our markup, we find that various portions of the DOM may require styling influences on the initial page load as well as interaction events or cues to adjust its structure, positioning, visibility, state, and skin. For this, classes are the clear suitor as it brings flexibility, modularity, inheritance, and a dynamic and unobtrusive nature to the table.
CSS tends to be in a constant phase of transition as new specifications are continuously proposed, drafted, and then left to the browsers for implementation. How and when a new feature is implemented is determined by the browser, often including their vendor prefix (-moz-, -webkit-, -o-, -ms-) to further dilute the feature. In fact, sometimes the W3C will define an official specification for a feature after one or more browsers have already implemented it. Despite the emergence of CSS3 in both support and usage over the last couple years, it is still very much in the early stages of standardization and implementation which is often changing and debated over. To help combat the confusion, the following article will focus on methods of determining support not just for styles but also their supported assignable values.